In my first ever post for
this blog, which had earlier appeared
on the blog of the United States Studies Centre at the University of Sydney ,
I mocked New York Times pundit and
professional centrist Thomas Friedman for his enthusiasm
for the Americans Elect project. Americans Elect is one of a recent
proliferation of high-profile attempts to elevate a moderate politician
(usually in the form of Michael Freakin’ Bloomberg) to the presidency in place
of those Democrats and Republicans whose partisanship stands between the
chattering classes and the enactment of their neo-Hamiltonian,
Something-Must-Be-Done agenda (and of course they ignore that Obama is enacting
most of it anyway). Unity08
was the name of last election cycle’s equivalent, and it was destroyed by
infighting (between its fanatically pro-Bloomberg wing and its moderately
pro-Bloomberg wing) despite the presence of big names from the Carter White
House. As I predicted, Americans Elect has gone
the same way.
The process used by Americans Elect to
nominate a presidential candidate was secretive and designed with a high
barrier to qualify for the nomination. No-one did so (former Louisiana Governor
Buddy Roemer came closest, after desperately seeking the AE nomination
following the failure of his quixotic tilt at the GOP nomination), leaving its
equally secretive backers empty-handed after qualifying for the ballot in
twenty-seven states. The predictions of pundits such as Friedman, who suggested
that Americans Elect would destroy the two-party duopoly the way Amazon.com
destroyed the likes of Borders, have been proven wrong. (And not for the first
time: the third-party shtick is one of Friedman’s stocks-in-trade. Last
time he even came up with a catchy slogan: ‘Green is the New Red, White and
Blue’.) The Big Two parties might be useless and unpopular, but Americans
aren’t interested in a candidate who has no support outside the Beltway and Lower Manhattan .
No comments:
Post a Comment